Case Overview

Legal Principle at Issue

Whether a series of Ohio laws prohibiting advertising by lawyers about a specific legal problem, containing illustration, or omitting crucial information violated the First Amendment.

Action

Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.

Cite this page

  • ZAUDERER v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved January 11, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/zauderer-v-office-disciplinary-counsel-supreme-court-ohio
  • ZAUDERER v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO, First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/zauderer-v-office-disciplinary-counsel-supreme-court-ohio (last visited 11 Jan. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "ZAUDERER v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/zauderer-v-office-disciplinary-counsel-supreme-court-ohio (accessed January 11, 2025).
  • "ZAUDERER v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 11 Jan. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/zauderer-v-office-disciplinary-counsel-supreme-court-ohio.
Share