ZAUDERER v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Supreme Court Cases
471 U.S. 626 (1985)
Case Overview
Legal Principle at Issue
Whether a series of Ohio laws prohibiting advertising by lawyers about a specific legal problem, containing illustration, or omitting crucial information violated the First Amendment.
Action
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.
Advocated for Respondent
- H. Bartow Farr III View all cases
Advocated for Petitioner
- Alan B. Morrison View all cases
Cite this page
- ZAUDERER v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved January 11, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/zauderer-v-office-disciplinary-counsel-supreme-court-ohio
- ZAUDERER v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO, First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/zauderer-v-office-disciplinary-counsel-supreme-court-ohio (last visited 11 Jan. 2025).
- Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "ZAUDERER v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/zauderer-v-office-disciplinary-counsel-supreme-court-ohio (accessed January 11, 2025).
- "ZAUDERER v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 11 Jan. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/zauderer-v-office-disciplinary-counsel-supreme-court-ohio.