Case Overview

Legal Principle at Issue

Whether a zoning ordinance classification based on a difference between motion picture theaters which exhibit sexually explicit "adult" movies and those which do not is unconstitutional because it is based on the content of communication protected by the First Amendment.

Action

Reversed. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.

Cite this page

  • YOUNG, MAYOR OF DETROIT, et al. v. AMERICAN MINI THEATRES, INC., et al.. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved March 6, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/young-mayor-detroit-et-al-v-american-mini-theatres-inc-et-al
  • YOUNG, MAYOR OF DETROIT, et al. v. AMERICAN MINI THEATRES, INC., et al., First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/young-mayor-detroit-et-al-v-american-mini-theatres-inc-et-al (last visited 6 Mar. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "YOUNG, MAYOR OF DETROIT, et al. v. AMERICAN MINI THEATRES, INC., et al.." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/young-mayor-detroit-et-al-v-american-mini-theatres-inc-et-al (accessed March 6, 2025).
  • "YOUNG, MAYOR OF DETROIT, et al. v. AMERICAN MINI THEATRES, INC., et al.." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 6 Mar. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/young-mayor-detroit-et-al-v-american-mini-theatres-inc-et-al.
Share