Case Overview

Legal Principle at Issue

Whether a New York statute prohibiting publications of violent materials "principally made up of criminal news, police reports, or accounts of criminal deeds, or pictures, or stories of deeds of bloodshed, lust or crime," is overly vague and violates the freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment.

Action

Reversed. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.

Cite this page

  • WINTERS v. NEW YORK. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved April 13, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/winters-v-new-york
  • WINTERS v. NEW YORK, First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/winters-v-new-york (last visited 13 Apr. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "WINTERS v. NEW YORK." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/winters-v-new-york (accessed April 13, 2025).
  • "WINTERS v. NEW YORK." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 13 Apr. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/winters-v-new-york.
Share