WIEMAN et al. v. UPDEGRAFF et al.
Supreme Court Cases
344 U.S. 183 (1952)
Case Overview
Legal Principle at Issue
Whether a state loyalty oath violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Action
Reversed. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.
Advocated for Respondent
- Fred Hansen View all cases
Advocated for Petitioner
- H. D. Emery View all cases
Cite this page
- WIEMAN et al. v. UPDEGRAFF et al.. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved March 31, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/wieman-et-al-v-updegraff-et-al
- WIEMAN et al. v. UPDEGRAFF et al., First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/wieman-et-al-v-updegraff-et-al (last visited 31 Mar. 2025).
- Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "WIEMAN et al. v. UPDEGRAFF et al.." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/wieman-et-al-v-updegraff-et-al (accessed March 31, 2025).
- "WIEMAN et al. v. UPDEGRAFF et al.." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 31 Mar. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/wieman-et-al-v-updegraff-et-al.