Case Overview

Legal Principle at Issue

Whether a Texas statute authorizing injunctions against exhibition of obscene motions pictures violated the First Amendment's bar on prior restraints because it authorized temporary injunctions of indefinite duration.

Action

Affirmed (includes modified). Petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition.

Cite this page

  • VANCE et al. v. UNIVERSAL AMUSEMENT CO., INC., et al.. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved March 6, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/vance-et-al-v-universal-amusement-co-inc-et-al
  • VANCE et al. v. UNIVERSAL AMUSEMENT CO., INC., et al., First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/vance-et-al-v-universal-amusement-co-inc-et-al (last visited 6 Mar. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "VANCE et al. v. UNIVERSAL AMUSEMENT CO., INC., et al.." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/vance-et-al-v-universal-amusement-co-inc-et-al (accessed March 6, 2025).
  • "VANCE et al. v. UNIVERSAL AMUSEMENT CO., INC., et al.." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 6 Mar. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/vance-et-al-v-universal-amusement-co-inc-et-al.
Share