Case Overview

Legal Principle at Issue

Whether the seizure of 37 photographs by customs agents under a federal law prohibiting importation of obscene material violated the First Amendment.

Action

Reversed and remanded. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.

Cite this page

  • UNITED STATES v. THIRTY-SEVEN (37) PHOTOGRAPHS (LUROS, CLAIMANT). (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved March 6, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/united-states-v-thirty-seven-37-photographs-luros-claimant
  • UNITED STATES v. THIRTY-SEVEN (37) PHOTOGRAPHS (LUROS, CLAIMANT), First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/united-states-v-thirty-seven-37-photographs-luros-claimant (last visited 6 Mar. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "UNITED STATES v. THIRTY-SEVEN (37) PHOTOGRAPHS (LUROS, CLAIMANT)." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/united-states-v-thirty-seven-37-photographs-luros-claimant (accessed March 6, 2025).
  • "UNITED STATES v. THIRTY-SEVEN (37) PHOTOGRAPHS (LUROS, CLAIMANT)." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 6 Mar. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/united-states-v-thirty-seven-37-photographs-luros-claimant.
Share