Case Overview

Legal Principle at Issue

Whether a statute punishing knowing transportation of obscene material was overbroad because it failed to distinguish between public and nonpublic transportation, violating the First Amendment.

Action

Vacated and remanded. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.

Cite this page

  • UNITED STATES v. ORITO. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved March 6, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/united-states-v-orito
  • UNITED STATES v. ORITO, First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/united-states-v-orito (last visited 6 Mar. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "UNITED STATES v. ORITO." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/united-states-v-orito (accessed March 6, 2025).
  • "UNITED STATES v. ORITO." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 6 Mar. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/united-states-v-orito.
Share