Case Overview

Legal Principle at Issue

Whether the denial of a city facility for a production of "Hair" because it contained "obscene" conduct constituted a prior restraint and violated the First Amendment.

Action

Reversed. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.

Cite this page

  • SOUTHEASTERN PROMOTIONS, LTD. v. CONRAD et al.. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved March 6, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/southeastern-promotions-ltd-v-conrad-et-al
  • SOUTHEASTERN PROMOTIONS, LTD. v. CONRAD et al., First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/southeastern-promotions-ltd-v-conrad-et-al (last visited 6 Mar. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "SOUTHEASTERN PROMOTIONS, LTD. v. CONRAD et al.." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/southeastern-promotions-ltd-v-conrad-et-al (accessed March 6, 2025).
  • "SOUTHEASTERN PROMOTIONS, LTD. v. CONRAD et al.." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 6 Mar. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/southeastern-promotions-ltd-v-conrad-et-al.
Share