SMITH, JUDGE, et al. v. DAILY MAIL PUBLISHING CO. et al.
Supreme Court Cases
443 U.S. 97 (1979)
Case Overview
Action
Affirmed (includes modified). Petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition.
Advocated for Respondent
- Floyd Abrams View all cases
Advocated for Petitioner
- Cletus B. Hanley View all cases
Cite this page
- SMITH, JUDGE, et al. v. DAILY MAIL PUBLISHING CO. et al.. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved April 22, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/smith-judge-et-al-v-daily-mail-publishing-co-et-al
- SMITH, JUDGE, et al. v. DAILY MAIL PUBLISHING CO. et al., First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/smith-judge-et-al-v-daily-mail-publishing-co-et-al (last visited 22 Apr. 2025).
- Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "SMITH, JUDGE, et al. v. DAILY MAIL PUBLISHING CO. et al.." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/smith-judge-et-al-v-daily-mail-publishing-co-et-al (accessed April 22, 2025).
- "SMITH, JUDGE, et al. v. DAILY MAIL PUBLISHING CO. et al.." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 22 Apr. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/smith-judge-et-al-v-daily-mail-publishing-co-et-al.