Case Overview

Legal Principle at Issue

Whether a California law banning indecent as well as obscene interstate commercial telephone messages violated the First Amendment's free speech guarantee

Action

Affirmed (includes modified). Petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition.

Cite this page

  • SABLE COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al.. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved April 3, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/sable-communications-california-inc-v-federal-communications-commission-et-al
  • SABLE COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al., First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/sable-communications-california-inc-v-federal-communications-commission-et-al (last visited 3 Apr. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "SABLE COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al.." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/sable-communications-california-inc-v-federal-communications-commission-et-al (accessed April 3, 2025).
  • "SABLE COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al.." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 3 Apr. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/sable-communications-california-inc-v-federal-communications-commission-et-al.
Share