Case Overview

Legal Principle at Issue

Whether a Missouri law limiting areas of information that can be advertised by lawyers violates freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment.

Action

Reversed. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.

Cite this page

  • in re R. M. J.. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved April 21, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/re-r-m-j
  • in re R. M. J., First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/re-r-m-j (last visited 21 Apr. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "in re R. M. J.." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/re-r-m-j (accessed April 21, 2025).
  • "in re R. M. J.." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 21 Apr. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/re-r-m-j.
Share