Case Overview

Legal Principle at Issue

Whether a Florida statute that afforded a right to reply to personal attacks on political candidates by newspapers violated the First Amendment.

Action

Reversed. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.

Importance of Case

In his 2005 memoir, Floyd Abrams, who filed an amicus brief, noted that "even though voters might have had more information as a result of the statute, the Court concluded that this was simply not an area in which a state legislature could" act.

Cite this page

  • MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING CO., DIVISION OF KNIGHT NEWSPAPERS, INC. v. TORNILLO. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved March 30, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/miami-herald-publishing-co-division-knight-newspapers-inc-v-tornillo
  • MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING CO., DIVISION OF KNIGHT NEWSPAPERS, INC. v. TORNILLO, First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/miami-herald-publishing-co-division-knight-newspapers-inc-v-tornillo (last visited 30 Mar. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING CO., DIVISION OF KNIGHT NEWSPAPERS, INC. v. TORNILLO." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/miami-herald-publishing-co-division-knight-newspapers-inc-v-tornillo (accessed March 30, 2025).
  • "MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING CO., DIVISION OF KNIGHT NEWSPAPERS, INC. v. TORNILLO." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 30 Mar. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/miami-herald-publishing-co-division-knight-newspapers-inc-v-tornillo.
Share