Case Overview

Legal Principle at Issue

Whether an injunction against the mailing of several "obscene" magazines featuring photos of nude male models violated the First Amendment.

Action

Reversed. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.

Importance of Case

This was the first occasion on which the Court was given plenary review to a Post Office Department order holding matter "nonmailable" because obscene.

Cite this page

  • MANUAL ENTERPRISES, INC., et al. v. DAY, POSTMASTER GENERAL. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved April 13, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/manual-enterprises-inc-et-al-v-day-postmaster-general
  • MANUAL ENTERPRISES, INC., et al. v. DAY, POSTMASTER GENERAL, First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/manual-enterprises-inc-et-al-v-day-postmaster-general (last visited 13 Apr. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "MANUAL ENTERPRISES, INC., et al. v. DAY, POSTMASTER GENERAL." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/manual-enterprises-inc-et-al-v-day-postmaster-general (accessed April 13, 2025).
  • "MANUAL ENTERPRISES, INC., et al. v. DAY, POSTMASTER GENERAL." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 13 Apr. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/manual-enterprises-inc-et-al-v-day-postmaster-general.
Share