GARY E. PEEL v. ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION OF ILLINOIS
Supreme Court Cases
496 U.S. 91 (1990)
Case Overview
Legal Principle at Issue
Whether a rule barring lawyers from advertising certification as a legal specialist violated the First Amendment's freedom of speech clause.
Action
Reversed and remanded. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.
Advocated for Respondent
- William F. Moran III View all cases
Advocated for Petitioner
- Bruce J. Ennis Jr. View all cases
Cite this page
- GARY E. PEEL v. ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION OF ILLINOIS. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved April 24, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/gary-e-peel-v-attorney-registration-and-disciplinary-commission-illinois
- GARY E. PEEL v. ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION OF ILLINOIS, First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/gary-e-peel-v-attorney-registration-and-disciplinary-commission-illinois (last visited 24 Apr. 2025).
- Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "GARY E. PEEL v. ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION OF ILLINOIS." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/gary-e-peel-v-attorney-registration-and-disciplinary-commission-illinois (accessed April 24, 2025).
- "GARY E. PEEL v. ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION OF ILLINOIS." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 24 Apr. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/gary-e-peel-v-attorney-registration-and-disciplinary-commission-illinois.