FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION v. WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE, INC.
Supreme Court Cases
551 U.S. 449 (2007)
Case Overview
Legal Principle at Issue
Whether the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Acts ban on election season campaign ads by corporations violates the First Amendment.
Action
Affirmed (includes modified). Petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition.
Advocated for Respondent
- James Bopp Jr. View all cases
Advocated for Petitioner
- Paul D. Clement View all cases
- Seth P. Waxman View all cases
Cite this page
- FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION v. WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE, INC.. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved April 14, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/federal-election-commission-v-wisconsin-right-life-inc
- FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION v. WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE, INC., First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/federal-election-commission-v-wisconsin-right-life-inc (last visited 14 Apr. 2025).
- Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION v. WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE, INC.." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/federal-election-commission-v-wisconsin-right-life-inc (accessed April 14, 2025).
- "FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION v. WISCONSIN RIGHT TO LIFE, INC.." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 14 Apr. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/federal-election-commission-v-wisconsin-right-life-inc.