ERZNOZNIK v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
Supreme Court Cases
422 U.S. 205 (1975)
Case Overview
Legal Principle at Issue
Whether a Florida ordinance making it a public nuisance and a punishable offense for a drive-in movie theater to exhibit films containing nudity, when the screen is visible from a public street or place, violates the First Amendment guarantee to freedom of speech and expression.
Action
Reversed. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.
Advocated for Respondent
- William Lee Allen View all cases
Advocated for Petitioner
- William H. Maness View all cases
Cite this page
- ERZNOZNIK v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved March 6, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/erznoznik-v-city-jacksonville
- ERZNOZNIK v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/erznoznik-v-city-jacksonville (last visited 6 Mar. 2025).
- Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "ERZNOZNIK v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/erznoznik-v-city-jacksonville (accessed March 6, 2025).
- "ERZNOZNIK v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 6 Mar. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/erznoznik-v-city-jacksonville.