Case Overview

Legal Principle at Issue

Whether an order of appellee New York Public Service Commission that prohibits the inclusion by appellant and other public utility companies in monthly bills of inserts discussing controversial issues of public policy directly infringes the freedom of speech protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments and thus is invalid.

Action

Reversed. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.

Cite this page

  • CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEW YORK. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved April 26, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/consolidated-edison-company-new-york-inc-v-public-service-commission-new-york
  • CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEW YORK, First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/consolidated-edison-company-new-york-inc-v-public-service-commission-new-york (last visited 26 Apr. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEW YORK." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/consolidated-edison-company-new-york-inc-v-public-service-commission-new-york (accessed April 26, 2025).
  • "CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEW YORK." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 26 Apr. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/consolidated-edison-company-new-york-inc-v-public-service-commission-new-york.
Share