Case Overview

Action

Reversed. Petitioning party received a favorable disposition.

Facts/Syllabus

The application of appellants (the Communist Party of Indiana, certain of its officers and potential voters, and its candidates for President and Vice President) for a place on the Indiana ballot for the 1972 general election was rejected for failure to submit a statutory loyalty oath stating that the Party "does not advocate the overthrow of local, state or national government by force or violence." Appellants, contending that the statute was unconstitutional, thereupon filed this action in the District Court for injunctive and declaratory relief.

Cite this page

  • COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIANA et al. v. WHITCOMB, GOVERNOR OF INDIANA, et al.. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved April 14, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/communist-party-indiana-et-al-v-whitcomb-governor-indiana-et-al
  • COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIANA et al. v. WHITCOMB, GOVERNOR OF INDIANA, et al., First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/communist-party-indiana-et-al-v-whitcomb-governor-indiana-et-al (last visited 14 Apr. 2025).
  • Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIANA et al. v. WHITCOMB, GOVERNOR OF INDIANA, et al.." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/communist-party-indiana-et-al-v-whitcomb-governor-indiana-et-al (accessed April 14, 2025).
  • "COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIANA et al. v. WHITCOMB, GOVERNOR OF INDIANA, et al.." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 14 Apr. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/communist-party-indiana-et-al-v-whitcomb-governor-indiana-et-al.
Share