BOLGER et al. v. YOUNGS DRUG PRODUCTS CORP.
Supreme Court Cases
463 U.S. 60 (1983)
Case Overview
Legal Principle at Issue
Whether a federal law prohibiting the mailing of unsolicited advertisements for contraceptives violates the First Amendment.
Action
Affirmed (includes modified). Petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition.
Advocated for Respondent
- Jerold S. Solovy View all cases
Advocated for Petitioner
- David A. Strauss View all cases
Cite this page
- BOLGER et al. v. YOUNGS DRUG PRODUCTS CORP.. (n.d.). First Amendment Library. Retrieved April 26, 2025, from https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/bolger-et-al-v-youngs-drug-products-corp
- BOLGER et al. v. YOUNGS DRUG PRODUCTS CORP., First Amendment Library, https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/bolger-et-al-v-youngs-drug-products-corp (last visited 26 Apr. 2025).
- Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). "BOLGER et al. v. YOUNGS DRUG PRODUCTS CORP.." Oyez. https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/bolger-et-al-v-youngs-drug-products-corp (accessed April 26, 2025).
- "BOLGER et al. v. YOUNGS DRUG PRODUCTS CORP.." First Amendment Library. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), n.d. 26 Apr. 2025, www.thefire.org/supreme-court/bolger-et-al-v-youngs-drug-products-corp.