Table of Contents
Speech Code of the Month: Drexel University
![](/sites/default/files/styles/379x213/public/2014/01/drexel-university-scotm-revised-feat.png?h=caeb18d4&itok=o7WDgFmt)
FIRE announces its Speech Code of the Month for September 2006: Drexel University.
There are some trends that, once they go out of style the first time, should never be revived. But some people won’t learn. In the fashion world, for example, leggings and high-waisted, tapered-leg “mom jeans” have (to my horror) regained popularity. And in the world of academia, Drexel University has resurrected an old University of Connecticut speech code from 1989 that has long been skewered as a prime example of political correctness run amok.
Drexel University’s harassment policy bans “inconsiderate jokes” and “inappropriately directed laughter.” (I don’t exactly know what inappropriately directed laughter means, but I’m guessing it occurs when you laugh at one of those inconsiderate jokes). Usually I try to explain the legal basis for why various speech codes are inappropriate, but I think that is totally unnecessary here. A ban on inconsiderate jokes?!? Honestly, can you think of a joke that is considerate? Here, I’ll try to come up with one:
Q: Why did the blonde write “TGIF” on her shoes?
A: Because she was very happy that it was Friday and was looking forward to an evening out with her friends.
Considerate, yes; funny, not even close. That’s the thing about jokes—the funny ones are pretty much always inconsiderate to someone. So what policies like this really want to do is ban jokes, because they might hurt someone’s feelings. (The real answer to the joke is: “Because it stands for ‘Toes Go in First.’” But see, that’s inconsiderate. And if you laughed, you just committed “inappropriately directed laughter.” So I hope you’re not reading this at Drexel.)
This code represents the absolute worst of political correctness—not only won’t they let you tell certain types of jokes, they will even punish you for finding them funny. This is Orwellian thought policing at its worst, and Drexel ought to be ashamed.
Much like leggings, this speech code went out of style in the 1980s—let’s hope Drexel (unlike the fashion world) has the good sense to quickly realize its mistake.
If you believe that your college or university should be a Speech Code of the Month, please e-mail speechcodes@thefire.org with a link to the policy and a brief description of why you think attention should be drawn to this code.
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.
![Jeff Hunt wearing "Pro Life U" sweatshirt](/sites/default/files/styles/334x250/public/2024/07/JEFF_HUNT_PROLIFEU_56.jpg?h=17ddf58a&itok=hpIJpeXt)
![TikTok logo behind red bars](/sites/default/files/styles/334x250/public/2024/07/TikTok%20Behind%20bars.jpg?h=def3cf70&itok=BZpDTHZ8)
FIRE brief: TikTok law is unprecedented threat to Americans’ expressive rights
TikTok users and TikTok itself are challenging a new law that singles out and effectively bans an entire communications platform used by millions of Americans.
![The Davidson County Courthouse in Nashville, Tennessee](/sites/default/files/styles/334x250/public/2024/07/Davidson%20County%20Courthouse.jpg?h=1389ae57&itok=Z7-Jbyih)
Getting copyright wrong: Nashville judge cites copyright law to withhold Covenant school shooter’s writings
The public has a right to see the Covenant school shooter’s writings, but a Nashville judge is using copyright law to block a newspaper’s FOIA request.
![UW-La Crosse professor Joe Gow gestures to an audience in an auditorium on campus](/sites/default/files/styles/334x250/public/2024/07/Joe%20Gow.jpg?h=b69f83ed&itok=MRFBCWyC)
The naked truth: University of Wisconsin’s push to fire professor over porn hobby is bad for all faculty
UW-La Crosse’s attempts to oust Joe Gow chill free speech and strike a major blow against tenure.