Table of Contents
Speech Code of the Month: Davidson College
![](/sites/default/files/styles/379x213/public/2014/01/davidson-college-scotm-revised-feat.png?h=caeb18d4&itok=7TMlCkJi)
FIRE announces its Speech Code of the Month for March 2006: Davidson College.
Attention, theater majors at Davidson: you’d better think twice before putting on a production of Guys and Dolls or Funny Girl. That’s because Davidson’s Sexual Harassment Policy prohibits the use of “patronizing remarks” such as “referring to an adult as ‘girl,’ ‘boy,’ ‘hunk,’ ‘doll,’ ‘honey,’” or “sweetie.”
I also hope that Davidson students are prepared for four years of romantic solitude, since that same policy prohibits “comments or inquiries about dating.” Good luck finding a date without making a comment or inquiry about dating.
Also prohibited, among many other things, are “jokes,” “teasing,” “dismissive comments,” “making [offensive] facial expressions,” and “wearing inappropriate or sexually suggestive clothing.” The policy kind of leaves you wondering what you can do or say at Davidson. And that is precisely the problem. While I seriously doubt that Davidson would actually discipline a student for staging a production of Guys and Dolls, this policy explicitly bans so much speech and expression that students must watch everything they say or do to make sure they do not run afoul of it. That is what we call a “chilling effect” on speech, and it is unacceptable.
Davidson’s homepage proclaims: “Let learning be cherished where liberty has arisen.” Liberty will not arise at Davidson until it grants its students the rights they deserve.
If you believe that your college or university should be a Speech Code of the Month, please email speechcodes@thefire.org with a link to the policy and a brief description of why you think attention should be drawn to this code.
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.
![Jeff Hunt wearing "Pro Life U" sweatshirt](/sites/default/files/styles/334x250/public/2024/07/JEFF_HUNT_PROLIFEU_56.jpg?h=17ddf58a&itok=hpIJpeXt)
![TikTok logo behind red bars](/sites/default/files/styles/334x250/public/2024/07/TikTok%20Behind%20bars.jpg?h=def3cf70&itok=BZpDTHZ8)
FIRE brief: TikTok law is unprecedented threat to Americans’ expressive rights
TikTok users and TikTok itself are challenging a new law that singles out and effectively bans an entire communications platform used by millions of Americans.
![The Davidson County Courthouse in Nashville, Tennessee](/sites/default/files/styles/334x250/public/2024/07/Davidson%20County%20Courthouse.jpg?h=1389ae57&itok=Z7-Jbyih)
Getting copyright wrong: Nashville judge cites copyright law to withhold Covenant school shooter’s writings
The public has a right to see the Covenant school shooter’s writings, but a Nashville judge is using copyright law to block a newspaper’s FOIA request.
![UW-La Crosse professor Joe Gow gestures to an audience in an auditorium on campus](/sites/default/files/styles/334x250/public/2024/07/Joe%20Gow.jpg?h=b69f83ed&itok=MRFBCWyC)
The naked truth: University of Wisconsin’s push to fire professor over porn hobby is bad for all faculty
UW-La Crosse’s attempts to oust Joe Gow chill free speech and strike a major blow against tenure.