Table of Contents
FIRE statement on Office for Civil Rights’ use of ‘anti-Semitism’ definition
FIRE is deeply disappointed by the decision of the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to reopen an investigation into a 2011 complaint against Rutgers University utilizing a definition of anti-Semitism that threatens speech protected by the First Amendment. The definition’s inherent vagueness allows for the investigation and punishment of core political speech. This is an unacceptable result.
FIRE has clearly and consistently opposed the use of this problematic definition in both university policy and legislation at the state and federal level. We do so again today.
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.
One day after FIRE lawsuit, Congress passes changes to filming permits in national parks
The EXPLORE Act loosens restrictions on how the National Parks Service issues permits for filming on public lands.
VICTORY: FIRE lawsuit leads California to halt law penalizing reporters, advocates, and victims who discuss publicly known information about sealed arrest records
A federal court today halted enforcement of a California law that officials deployed to suppress journalism about a controversial tech CEO's sealed arrest records.
O holy fight: New Hampshire Satanic Temple statue threatened by more than vandals
The First Amendment affords equal protection to all holiday displays, from Baphomet to Baby Jesus.
FIRE to Congress: More work needed to protect free speech on college campuses
FIRE joined Rep. Murphy’s annual Campus Free Speech Roundtable to discuss the free speech opportunities and challenges facing colleges.