Table of Contents
Central Michigan University Grants Students Full Freedom of Association
In today’s press release, FIRE announced that Central Michigan University (CMU) has agreed to revise an “anti-discrimination” policy it had applied to all registered student organizations. CMU’s policy stated that groups could not deny membership to students on the basis of a host of categories, including “political persuasion.” Under that policy, any ideological or political group on campus, including Young Americans for Freedom (YAF—the affected group in this case), Students Against Discrimination, and the Gay/Straight Alliance would have to admit members hostile to the group’s mission.
FIRE has often opposed universities’ application of anti-discrimination policies that include “belief” as a blanket protected category, since ideological, political, and religious organizations should have the right to associate only with other students who share their beliefs. Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000) is the leading Supreme Court case supporting this position. We usually make these arguments on behalf of religious student organizations, such as the Christian group Princeton Faith and Action, LSU’s Muslim Students Association, or the Christian Law Students’ Association at Pace Law School, all of which were told by their respective administrations that they could not limit membership to students who shared their beliefs.
Interestingly, CMU seemed to at least partially appreciate the necessity of allowing groups to require members to have shared beliefs, because its Registered Student Organization Manual allows religious organizations to “use religious beliefs as a criterion for selection of membership or leadership.” CMU’s restrictions on limiting group membership based on belief therefore applied only to secular ideological groups—a distinction with no basis in law or logic.
The “horror scenario” FIRE sometimes posits is that if an ideologically-based group were forced to admit members who did not agree with the group’s mission, those members could feasibly undermine the group from the inside. At CMU, this possibility became reality when students started attending and disrupting meetings of the conservative YAF group and even started a Facebook.com group for “People who believe the Young Americans for Freedom is a Hate Group.” One student posted on that group’s wall:
The best way to get rid of them, is for everyone in this group to go to their meetings and we all vote eachother [sic] on to the eboard [sic] and dissolve the group.
Another thing we can do is make it public that we intend to bring in a ton of people and watch them change their membership requirements which might make them slip up and break a cmu [sic] discrimination policy.
CMU reacted to concerns from YAF President Dennis Lennox II about the group’s impending demise by upholding the non-discrimination policy. CMU’s Director of Student Life wrote in an e-mail to Lennox that YAF could “not require members to be ‘like-minded’ as that opens [the group] up to discrimination based on political persuasion.”
YAF appealed to FIRE, and we wrote to CMU President Michael Rao on March 16 to inform him that CMU’s policy was unconstitutional, that it contradicted the Court’s decision in Boy Scouts v. Dale, and that it placed YAF in danger of being deliberately undermined by students who wished to banish the group from campus.
To FIRE’s delight, President Rao responded by vowing to change the policy in question. Within days, CMU issued an e-mail to all registered student organizations explaining the revision to the anti-discrimination policy. That e-mail stated:
[FIRE’s] inquiry prompted a review of CMU’s policy and general counsel has advised that the legal principle in question is “freedom of association,” which has been protected by the courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, in several cases. Like most universities, CMU will not oppose established principles as promulgated by the highest courts.
CMU has developed a new policy, which states that “[a] belief-based registered student organization may use its belief system as a criterion for selection of membership or leadership.” President Rao assures FIRE that this policy will be fully implemented by the beginning of the Fall 2007 semester.
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.
Debating social media content moderation
Can free speech and content moderation on social media coexist? Jonathan Rauch and Ren?e DiResta discuss the complexities of content moderation on social media platforms. They explore how platforms balance free expression with the need to moderate...
Amy Wax is academic freedom's canary in the coal mine
Penn's chilling decision to punish the controversial professor calls tenure protections at private universities into question
What’s on deck for the upcoming Court term — First Amendment News 441
First Amendment News is a weekly blog and newsletter about free expression issues by Ronald K. L. Collins and is editorially independent from FIRE.
This is not a test: FIRE opposes FCC’s plan to regulate AI in political ads
The FCC appears to be gearing up for a regulatory power grab, looking for opportunities to plant its flag in a burgeoning new field.