Mohammed Cartoon Controversy: FIRE Response to Intimidation and Newspaper Disputes

Case Materials

Media Coverage

  • "When Speech Becomes a Crime," Cinnamon Stillwell, San Francisco Chronicle, June 28, 2006: It seems that putting forward a political or religious viewpoint on campus that is considered politically incorrect is now grounds for persecution and possible expulsion. Students have found themselves so beleaguered by what often appear to be politically motivated witch hunts that they have felt the need to turn to organizations such as the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education for legal assistance.
  • "U.S. media response to cartoons skewered," Margaret Ramirez and Gerry Doyle, Chicago Tribune, April 26, 2006: Panelist Greg Lukianoff, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, said the issue was simple: Journalists are afraid. "There's a lot of dishonesty" in the media's explanation for not displaying the cartoons, he said. "Nobody has a right not to be offended."
  • "'Free speech' cries ring hollow on college campuses and beyond," Nat Hentoff, USA Today, April 19, 2006: Century College's administration — and indeed, all who wither amid such free speech controversies — should welcome a challenge from Oliver Wendell Holmes: "If there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other, it is the principle of free thought — not free thought for those who agree with us, but freedom for the thought that we hate."
  • "Speech codes choke off discourse, satire," Jason Doré, The Daily Reveille (Louisiana State Univ.), April 6, 2006: The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education currently gives LSU’s speech code a rating of red. According to the FIRE Web site, a red-light university has at least one policy that both clearly and substantially restricts freedom of speech. The University’s harassment policies are singled out as a threat to speech on the FIRE rating Web site.
  • "The image of hypocrisy," Harvey Silverglate, The Boston Phoenix, March 29, 2006: As Greg Lukianoff, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, has noted, these “cartoons are almost certainly the most relevant and newsworthy cartoons in history. One would be hard-pressed to come up with other cartoons or even images that have resulted in so much controversy, death, and international strife.”
  • "Images offensive to Muslims are debated," Matthew Hay Brown, Baltimore Sun, March 14, 2006: "There is no right not to be offended," Mitchell, a program officer with the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, told an audience of about 80 last night at the Johns Hopkins University. "Having your most deeply held convictions questioned doesn't destroy you. It doesn't turn you into a child. It makes you question why you have them. That's good for us. That's why we come to college."
  • "College Urged to Stop Censoring Prof's Display of Muslim Cartoons," Jim Brown, Agape Press, March 13, 2006: Advocating on Murdock's behalf, FIRE wrote to Century College President Lawrence Litecky, stating that the school's "responsibility to free speech and open inquiry far outweighs any responsibility the college has to avoid offense" and that Murdock could not be punished for posting the drawings.
  • "Professor Fears Retribution Over Mohammed Cartoons," Nathan Burchfiel, Cybercast News Service, March 10, 2006: Lukianoff said the school has a duty "to protect speakers from being silenced by others" and that administrators "need to understand that their first duty is to promote the open exchange of ideas on their campus, not to cater to those who would prefer silence on provocative matters."
  • "Professor censored over Muhammad cartoons," World Net Daily, March 10, 2006: Stated Murdock: "We are a college. We are supposed to be a forum for the free exchange of ideas. If we can't talk about this controversy at a college, where are we supposed to talk about it? We are supposed to be able not merely to deal with controversy but actually to welcome it!"
  • "Specifics on Max P. cartoon incident still cloudy," Hassan S. Ali, Chicago Maroon, February 24, 2006: In drawing the line between free speech and hate speech, Mitchell echoed Ali’s sentiments based on his own experiences with FIRE. “Nobody’s ever said free speech is neat,” Mitchell said. “The best way to fight hateful speech is by more speech.”
  • "Objectivists host panel on Danish cartoons," Laura Bishop, Chicago Maroon, November 29, 2009: Entitled “Free Speech and the Danish Cartoons,” the panel event featured speakers Yaron Brook, president and executive director of the Ayn Rand Institute; Tom Flynn, the editor of Free Inquiry magazine; and Greg Lukianoff, the president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.